The Future of Social Media: Why Decentralizing and the Fediverse Matter Now More Than Ever

There was a time before social media and social networks as we know them, where people would talk to each other in person, isolated by geography. Then we figured out how to send our writing, and there was a period when pen-pals and postcards were important. News organizations adopted technology faster as reports came in from an ever increasing geography until, finally, we ran out of geography.

Social media has become an integral part of our lives, connecting us to friends, families, communities, and global events in ways that were unimaginable just a few decades ago. Yet, as platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter (now X) dominate our digital landscape, serious questions arise about privacy, control, and freedom. Who owns our data? How are algorithms shaping our perceptions? Are we truly free in these spaces? Are we instead slaves to the algorithms?

It’s time to rethink social media. Enter decentralization and the Fediverse—a revolutionary approach to online networking that prioritizes freedom, community, and individual ownership.

The Problem with Centralized Social Media And Networks

At their core, mainstream social media platforms operate on a centralized model. They are controlled by corporations with one primary goal: profit. This model creates several challenges:

  1. Privacy Violations: Your data – likes, shares, private messages—becomes a commodity, sold to advertisers and third parties.
  2. Algorithmic Control: Centralized platforms decide what you see, often prioritizing sensational or divisive content to keep you engaged longer.
  3. Censorship: Content moderation decisions are made by corporations, leading to debates about free speech and fair enforcement of rules.
  4. Monopolization: A handful of companies dominate the space, stifling innovation and giving users little choice.

All of this comes to the fore with the recent issues in the United States surrounding Tik-Tok, which Jon Oliver recently mentioned on his show and which I mentioned here on KnowProSE.com prior. The same reasons that they want to ban TikTok are largely the same things other social networks already do – it’s just who they do it for or could potentially do it for. Yes, they are as guilty as any other social network of the same problems above.

These are real issues, too, related to who owns what regarding… you. They often leave you looking at the same kind of content and drag you down a rabbit hole while simply supporting your biases, and should you step out of line, you might find your reach limited or in some cases completely taken away. These issues have left many users feeling trapped, frustrated, and disillusioned.

Recently, there has been a reported mass exodus from one controlled network to another – from Twitter to BlueSky.

There’s a better way.

What Is the Fediverse?

The Fediverse (short for “federated universe”) is a network of interconnected, decentralized platforms that communicate using open standards. Unlike traditional social media, the Fediverse is not controlled by a single entity. Instead, it consists of independently operated servers—called “instances”—that can interact with each other.

Popular platforms within the Fediverse include:

  • Mastodon: A decentralized alternative to Twitter.
  • Pixelfed: An Instagram-like platform for sharing photos.
  • Peertube: A decentralized video-sharing platform.
  • WriteFreely: A blogging platform with a focus on minimalism and privacy.

These platforms empower users by giving them control over their data, their communities, and their online experiences.


Why Decentralization Matters

  1. Data Ownership: In the Fediverse, your data stays under your control. Each server is independently operated, and many prioritize privacy and transparency.
  2. Freedom of Choice: You can choose or create a server that aligns with your values. If you don’t like one instance, you can switch to another without losing your connections.
  3. Resilience Against Censorship: No single entity has the power to shut down the entire network.
  4. Community-Centric: Instead of being shaped by algorithms, communities in the Fediverse are human-driven and often self-moderated.

How You Can Join the Movement

  1. Explore Fediverse Platforms: Start by creating an account on Mastodon or another Fediverse platform. Many websites like joinmastodon.org can help you find the right instance.
  2. Support Decentralization: Advocate for open standards and decentralized technologies in your circles.
  3. Educate Others: Share the benefits of decentralization with your friends and family. Help them see that alternatives exist.
  4. Contribute to the Ecosystem: If you’re tech-savvy, consider hosting your own instance or contributing to open-source projects within the Fediverse.

The Call to Action

Social media doesn’t have to be controlled by a handful of tech giants. The Fediverse represents a vision for a better internet—one that values privacy, freedom, and genuine community. By choosing decentralized platforms, you’re taking a stand for a more equitable digital future.

So, what are you waiting for? Explore the Fediverse, join the conversation, and help build a social media landscape that works for everyone, not just the corporations.

Take the first step today. Decentralize your social media life and reclaim your digital freedom!

joinmastodon.org

Connecting WordPress.com Websites to Mastodon: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly.

Yesterday, I found that I could connect KnowProSE.com and RealityFragments.com to the Fediverse through Mastodon and decided to give it a try.

WordPress.com has a good article on connecting WordPress.com sites to the Fediverse, so there’s no need to rewrite that. What I noticed, however, is what everyone should be aware of.

I may actually disconnect the sites from the Fediverse in the near future because of what I write below, but if you are interested the links to the sites on Mastodon are:

That said, I’ll tell you why I’m not too pleased with these connections.

The Good

Clearly, having another outlet where posts are shared is always a good thing, and I actually had a good conversation related to something I posted because of it – these are good things. It creates hashtags from the tags created on your website.

Yet were they good enough? Is that enough?

The Bad

As it happens, these are automated accounts that the user cannot apparently log into on Mastodon. Because of that, interacting with users on Mastodon is not really something you can do. It automagically posts what you post on a WordPress.com site to the Fediverse, but it doesn’t handle the most important part of any part of social networks: Interaction.

I had hoped that the conversations would somehow connect to the comments on posts. That doesn’t happen. Also, because it posts what the title and an excerpt, it doesn’t have hashtags, which is how the Fediverse users find content.[corrected]

Because Mastodon doesn’t have functionality to retransmit with commentary, there’s just no getting around that.

The Ugly

Search engines aren’t big on the Fediverse yet, and that’s largely because it is by nature decentralized. Thus, it doesn’t really help search engine ranking, it doesn’t help people find your content through hashtags (the Bad), and it has a level of interactivity that is depressing enough to consider not doing it at all.

Takeaway

I am presently not impressed with this offering for the reasons above, but, I also know that sometimes time is a powerful factor. Things change, things are seen in a new light, etc.

For now, I’ll leave them up as they are and see what happens. I think I’ll give it about a month. Thus, if you read this article in May and the links to the Fediverse no longer work, you’ll know that I deemed them a waste of space.

Week One of Mastodon.

I’ve been on Mastodon a week now and thought I should write a little bit about the experience.

There’s not much to write about. It works. There are interesting people to follow, I’m confident that my data isn’t being collected, and my feed is always interesting because someone else’s algorithm isn’t controlling what I see.

It also ends up that when I wrote that when I attempted to use Mastodon it was ‘like trying to shag an unwilling octopus’, it had a lot to do with the people who landed there from my elder networks and didn’t really explain anything – leaving me wondering about which server to join, whether I needed to build my own server, etc.

It’s actually quite easy. It doesn’t really matter which server you’re on – I’m on social.mastodon – because they all connect through the Fediverse, which is to say that they are decentralized.

Relative to other social networks.

That last part is so important to me. When I was active on Facebook, I saw a very large decline over the years of quality content that I wanted to see. This was underlined by the latest discovery that Facebook is spamming users.

Twitter, or if you’re a Musk-bro, ‘X’, is much the same thing. What’s hilarious is that both of those social networks are trying to train their generative AIs and have the worst platforms because of AI and algorithms. Web 2.0 meets AI, chaos ensues.

LinkedIn deserves mention here since so many people use it, but… as far as professional networking, I don’t think it counts as much as building real connections outside of the leering eyes of Microsoft, and being asked to help write articles for them which I’m sure will be used to train their AI just so I can have a cool title. Nope, no thanks. Hit me in the wallet.

Pros and Cons.

I have yet to have a negative experience with anyone on Mastodon. In fact, when you respond to someone’s post for the first time, I get prompted to basically be courteous, and so I expect other people are as well.

I do miss being able to comment on something I retransmit – in Mastodon speak, that’s boosting. I’m not sure why that is, but I’ve found it’s not something I actually need.

The only thing that Mastodon lacks so far are connections with some family and friends who haven’t moved to Mastodon. That’s simply a factor of inertia, much like in the 1990s many people thought ‘The Internet’ was AOL, which Facebook has mimicked pretty well.

In all, I’m finding Mastodon worthwhile, and much less twitchy than the other social networks, largely because I’m not seeing crap I don’t want to see.

If I have a quiet mind to do other things and a social network is in the background, I consider that a win. Mastodon is a win.